Archive for the ‘Property Investment Strategy’ Category

The Centre for Housing Research Aotearoa New Zealand (CHRANZ) has come out with a large report detailing the housing needs for our country’s largest city and economic powerhouse, Auckland.   I invest in Auckland, and as President of the Auckland Property Investors’ Association, I was very pleased to read this report.  The news is excellent for Auckland property investors as it shows demand for Auckland housing is increasing which will put up values and rents in the long-term, and once we exit the downturn phase of this current property cycle, we will pass into the recovery phase and see a strong wave of rental increases and sound value increases, and then the boom phase will arrive where we shall see very strong capital growth (in excess of 10% per year).

The good news is that Auckland’s strong population is set to continue, and demand will increase from the 431,890 dwellings there are in the Auckland Region (ie. Auckland – the Super City) in 2006 at census time, by 39.3% to 601,420 by 2026.  This is a lot of demand that will only help property investors in terms of raising our rental income streams and also getting increases in the value of our properties.

Auckland our Super City - view north from Mt Eden

The world knows that Auckland is a fantastic place to live, as does the rest of New Zealand, even if some are too proud or scared to offend relatives in their former regions they have left to admit it.  In a repeat of last year’s result, Auckland was 4th (tied with Vancouver, Canada) in the 2010 Mercer Quality of Living annual survey out of all cities in the world.  Interestingly the 2006 New Zealand Census results showed 37% of Aucklanders were not born in New Zealand, and this number is thought to continue its rapid trend upwards.  With a lot of Kiwis wanting increased employment, income, business investment and entertainment options in an extremely desirable city, many current Aucklanders were not born in Auckland.  With an increased focus on high technology and service related jobs this century, manufacturing and indeed elementary and semi-skilled roles are not as necessary as they used to be.  As a result Auckland is getting what it needs younger and skilled migrants.  Auckland’s immigrants have a higher employment rate than New Zealand born Aucklanders.

CHRANZ’s Housing Projections for Auckland

The first report CHRANZ released was called Auckland Region Housing Market Assessment: 2006 – 2026. This stated that population growth will continue to strongly drive the Auckland region’s housing demand in this period.  This growth will require an extra 169,530 dwellings, which is a 39.3% increase to what we had in 2006.  A lot of the demand is from older people, and is for smaller, rental households.

Auckland needs to have a lot more dwellings...

By 2020 some parts of Auckland will not have sufficient residential land available to develop, meaning only one thing for prices and rental levels – they will go upwards as demand outstrips supply.  This is particularly so for the central Auckland isthmus (what used to be known as Auckland City – the area subtending the northern reaches of the Manukau Harbour and southern reaches of the Waitemata Harbour, including Auckland’s CBD, going as far east as the suburb of Glen Innes and as far west as Avondale).  51% of the employment growth will be in this subregion, but this area has a maximum capacity of only 32% of the Auckland region’s dwelling capacity.  Auckland Council’s planners will have to pay attention to this, as there will be more pressure as people continue to commute into the isthmus from the South, South-East, West and Northern parts of Auckland, and also East by boat from beautiful Waiheke Island.

Auckland's Waiheke Island

Key findings to help your Auckland property investments:

Other key findings from this Auckland housing report include the fact that renting continues to be increasingly popular.  Home ownership has reduced from 70.7% in the 1996 census to 66.9% in the 2006 census.  The fact that demand for rental accommodation (63.5%) will continue to greatly outstrip demand for owner-occupied dwellings (26.2%).  Affordability will be an issue with 39.6% of all renter households and 49.4% of all privately rented households (excludes Housing NZ) having to spend more than 30% of their household’s total gross income on rent and other housing costs (eg. water rates).  The size of the Intermediate Housing Market (‘IHM’) which is the number of private renter households that have at least one member in paid employment who cannot afford to purchase a dwelling at the lower quartile sale price, assuming standard bank lending criteria are applied, has increased from 39,700 to 77,100 households between 2001 and 2009.  Interestingly housing demand will be particularly shaped by the growth in older, couple-only and single-person households and will increase demand for smaller one and two bedroom dwellings.

Auckland Map

Lower demand for home ownership amongst younger households

In CHRANZ’s second report they covered the patterns and dynamics of housing demand among younger Auckland households.

It said the younger households age group (20-40 year olds) had experienced New Zealand’s biggest fall in home ownership rates between 1986 and 2006, with Auckland once again leading this national trend:

  • 17.9 percent among 25–29 year olds;
  • 17.7 percent among 30–34 years olds; and
  • 15.5 percent among 35–39 year olds.

On Saturday the 27th of November 2010 I will be the keynote presenter at NZ Property Masterclass – a full day seminar at Waipuna Hotel & Conference Centre in Mt Wellington, Auckland (near Sylvia Park on the edge of the Panmure Basin), with standard tickets at just $29, and gold tickets at $98.

Improve your financial knowledge, get updated on the current market and learn what strategies I am using for wealth creation for the remainder of this year and in 2011.

My topics covered

Come hear me present live at NZ Property Masterclass event, where I will be talking about:

  • Loss Attributing Qualifying Companies (“LAQCs”) being abolished and introducing the new tax structure, the Look Through Company (“LTC”)
  • a Market Update with my opinions on where the market is heading for 2011 backed up by graphs and facts
  • the untold truth about US Tax Deeds and Liens to follow up from my popular blog in March
  • the good, the bad and the ugly with Lease Options, and a number of lease option promoters
  • how you can create wealth in 2011, using the strategies I am successfully using on NZ properties in the current market.

Also included in the low $29 ticket price is access to 5 other fantastic speakers.

Your other speakers

Speaker #2:  ANDREW BRAGGINS  LL.B, BSc - Buddle Findlay

1. Local government, environment & resource management, litigation and dispute resolution expert
2. Andrew advises a range of clients, including developers, network utility operators, local authorities and financiers
3. Andrew has an in-depth insight into how local authorities work, having spent 3 years as a local government in-house council, and acting for many councils
4. Member of the Resource Management Law Association & Water NZ
5. Barrister & Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand

Learn all you need to know about how to deal with councils, the structure of the new Supercity and the Supercity’s impact on you as a property investor.

Speaker #3: JAN GALLOWAY  BA Cert. Crim (Criminology) - Corinthian Management

1. Principal Corinthian Property Management
2. Over 25 years as a property manager
3. Multi-millionaire property investor
4. Managed a leading central auckland property management division
5. Auckland Property Investors Association Board Secretary
6. Multiple award winner (property management related)

Jan knows all you ever needed to know about tenancies and the issues that arise from them.

Speaker #4: MARK TRAFFORD - Owner of Renovate to Profit

1. Principal of Renovate to Profit and Maintain to Profit
2. Renovating properties for over 20 years!
3. Accomplished Property Investor
4. Regular Contributor to Property Investor Magazine
5. Sought after speaker

Mark is an excellent property investors knows everything there is to know about renovating properties having done many dozens of properties.  He is an excellent project manager with unparalleled networks of quality tradespeople.  Join us and learn more about creating wealth through smart renovations!

Speaker #5: GARY HEY BCom - Mortgage People

1. Owner and Director of Mortgage People, a leading Auckland based mortgage broking firm
2. Bachelor of Commerce, member of the NZ Mortgage Brokers’ Association
3. Commercial, Industrial and Residential developments advisor as well as residential investment properties financing expert
4. Sought after speaker having a background in education

The banks and other major lenders criteria are changing and it is easier to get finance for property now.  Gary loves finding funding for your deals.  Bring on your best questions forward and he and his team will be there to assist you.

Overview of key topics covered during the day

1. The current market cycle – using current & historic data to identify our current position & determine where, when & how to purchase your next property deal
2. LAQCs & LTCs & what it means to your investment portfolio
3. Practical strategies to increase your rent easily in the current market
4. Hot strategies for 2011 – the strategies NZ Wealth Mentor’s principals and mentoring are using to make money from NZ property today, and how you can meet your financial goals in 2011
5. Understanding the new paradigm for obtaining finance – How to get banks to lend you $$
6. Where are the best strategies to use in 2011?
7. The untold truth about US Tax Liens & Lease Options – what you must know before you ever think of investing on them.

We will discuss all the current hot topics so that you can leave the event well informed and ready to invest successfully.

2 Ticket Options

There are standard tickets priced at just $29 which don’t include lunch or any extra.  The Gold Tickets however are priced at $98 and these include a delicious buffet lunch in a private room with David Whitburn and many of your presenters.  You also get a portfolio review and wealth plan by NZ Wealth Mentor’s head of property mentoring and Auckland Property Investors’ Association President, David Whitburn, to help you set and reach your financial dreams.

So are you going for GOLD???

In NZ Wealth Mentor we want to make sure you get all your financial goals. If you book online before November 20th we will also include our “Financial Mastery Success Plan” in the ticket price. Financial Mastery Success Plan is designed to look at your financial situation today to build a brighter future. It retails at $175 and you will get it for free as a part of this time constrained offer (3 days to go). Make sure you don’t miss out and book your gold seat (select from the menu) for NZ Property Masterclass today.

Register now on amiando.com - Event Registration

The Real Returns from Term Deposits

We only have to look at term deposit rates which now range between 1.55% and 6.75% with major lenders across various terms from 1 month to 5 years.  If for example you have $40,000 on term deposit with BNZ and you wanted to place this on term deposit you would be quoted a rate of 4.40%.  When tax is taken off at say 33%, your net rate becomes  2.95%, as tax must be paid first and is deducted at source from the borrower (bank).  If you add the great cash savings eater that is inflation into the mix – lets use the September 2010 quarter figure of 1.5% (the lowest CPI figure since March 2004 quarter too).  Your real return from this term deposit is just a paltry 1.45%.  Your $40,000 in 12 months time is really only worth $40,580, a net increase of $580.  That is hardly motivating to save lots of money in the bank, hence a lot of people moving to ‘invest’ in their own homes and lifestyles, spend on themselves as you only live once, invest in shares, managed funds including Kiwisaver products, gold, silver, commodities, foreign exchange and of course property.  The returns are no exciting enough for so many people from term deposits.

Basically I consider that term deposits are too heavily eroded by taxation and inflation.  As a result in a diversified portfolio  would only recommend a small portion of funds be held on term deposit for any significant length of time.  Instead I am massive fan of property, that’s obvious having served on the Board of the Auckland Property Investors’ Association as long as I have and having been elected its President earlier this year.

What I would instead do with $40,000

In my opinion $40,000 is a deposit on a positive cashflow property that you could and should buy over 10% below value.  Ie. here’s what I encouraged my mentoring student to do last week.  They went to ANZ and got loan pre-approval that will be fixed for 2 years at just 6.44% with your APIA membership entitling you to ANZ@work package discounts (0.25% discount off fixed rates) and receive a $500 contribution towards legal fees.  They will be contributing $36,800 as 20% of the purchase price ($184,000) for a two bedroom unit in Kelston (West Auckland) that has a registered valuation of $212,000.  They are buying this $28,000 below value, which gives them instant equity at purchase.  Try doing this with a term deposit, gold, silver etc!  The property is positive cashflow to the tune of over $2,000 per year, after an allowance for repairs & maintenance, insurance, and taking tax considerations into account with no building structure depreciation, but getting a Valu-it report to depreciate fit-out and chattels.  This $2,500 return is a lot higher than the $580 return, and don’t forget you didn’t even invest all $40,000.

The funny thing is that there are plenty of good deals and opportunities in the market.  Sometimes you just have to open your eyes and look.  Remember to protect yourself in the event that there is a slight negative market movement, by buying below true value.

NZ Property Mentor – Seminar

I am the keynote presenter at the NZ Property Mentor seminar at the Employers and Manufacturers’ Association premises in Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, Auckland at 6:30pm – 9pm this evening.  Come to hear me talk more about:

  1. The Current Market and House Price Movement -understanding the fear in the current market and contradicting statistics.
  2. Rental Levels – learn about recent market movements in the Auckland market, and how you can put your rents up to maximise your cashflow from property.
  3. Residential Tenancies Amendment Act – the governing document to determine rights and obligations between Landlords and Tenants has changed.  This has just undergone its largest changes in 24 years, so find out what these mean for you at this event
  4. Interest Rates - where interest rates are likely to be heading and how you can profit from it.
  5. Structure Update – Find out about the draft legislation which provides for LAQCs to be abolished, and for a new tax structure, Look Through Companies (LTCs) and with the tax depreciation changes earlier in the year. You will get get more information on what is the best structure for you.
  6. Where we are at in the Property Cycle
  7. Opportunities in Today’s Market
  8. My new improved comprehensive 12 month Group Mentoring programme with NZ Property Mentor.

Don’t delay, learn about the current market, recent legislative changes so you can keep on top of the new rules and not make very expensive mistakes, and hear about some of the wonderful opportunities for profiting from today’s property market.  Go to http://www.nzpropertymentor.info and register for your tickets now.

There’s a lot happening with interest rates at present, with many severe interest rate movements.  Also I have heard financial commentators on the radio, read in newspapers and seen on TV about how interest rates are going up, interest rates are going down and interest rates are going to stay relatively stable.  This is causing confusion amongst many borrowers.

The thing is all the commentators may be right.  This is because there is no such as the one interest rate.  For example if you went to your lender to get a loan right now, if approved you would be offered the choice of a floating or fixed rate.  If you choose a fixed rate, you would be offered the chance to fix this for 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years and if you are with BNZ, you have the additional choice of a 7 year fixed interest rate for maximum certainty.  For my overseas readers, we sadly do not currently offer the 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 year fixed interest loan periods that many other developed countries and in particular the USA have.  I am hoping for a 10 year fixed interest rate in the near future – but I got told by a leading banker that this is unlikely.

Current interest rates

Leading financial website Tarawera Publishing Limited lists all interest rates from their providers.  I would highly recommend all serious property investors bookmark their interest rates page:  http://www.mortgagerates.co.nz

The average floating rate across all major banks is a smidge over 6% (when acknowledging the Westpac Choices rate discount).  The fixed rates for when you lock in a certain defined interest rate for a set period of time, have a strong yield curve currently.  That is the rates of interest you pay as the length of time you fix go up sharply.  It has to be noted that this yield curve is now flattening (visually you can see this here).  Floating rates have gone up a bit, and the longer terms rate down a lot lately.

From last Thursday to today all the major banks dropped their 2- 5 year fixed interest rates.  We saw a week or so after the Official Cash Rate was put up 0.25% by the Reserve Bank that the floating rates went up by around 0.25%.  The OCR doesn’t strictly control interest rates.  It however is highly influential on short term (variable, 6 month and 1 year fixed rates).  On longer term fixed rates (3, 4  and 5 year) it is not very influential at all.

These longer term fixed rates are driven more by the returns NZ term deposit savers expect, and thanks to the Reserve Bank’s rules in June 2009, banks are not permitted to raise as much ‘hot money’ that they got from institutional foreign lenders – this was short term money typically rolling over every 90 days.

What Borrowers Should Do?

As mentioned in previous blogs on financial topics, do not have all your borrowings on one rate. Split your borrowings across a variety of interest rate periods.  Just like I advise having different banks as your property portfolio grows (to avoid the one bank trap – thanks Kieran Trass for teaching me this in 2003), it is imperative to split your borrowings at times like this.  Consider having a property schedule like I do and all my mentoring students do, where they have the loans on their properties set out including the fixed period expiry date.  Then graph this to split your borrowing and have an interest rate averaging strategy (“IRAS”) for your borrowings.   Imagine if you have total loans of $600,000.  You split them in this way:

  1. $100,000 floating at 6.00%
  2. $100,000 1 year fixed at 6.50% fixed interest rate period expiring 5 July 2011
  3. $100,000 2 year fixed at 6.90% fixed interest rate period expiring 5 July 2012
  4. $100,000 3 year fixed at 7.30% fixed interest rate period expiring 5 July 2013
  5. $100,000 4 year fixed at 7.60% fixed interest rate period expiring 5 July 2014
  6. $100,000 5 year fixed at 7.80% fixed interest rate period expiring 5 July 2015

In one years time your loan when the one year fixed rolls over, ie loan 2, you fix this loan for 5 years so it expires on 5 July 2016.  That way you have 6 loans all expiring at different times.  This does give you some protection in that if interest rates move up suddenly by 3% in one year (unlikely but possible), you only suffer an average rise of 0.5% in this way (as opposed to suffering all 3% rate increase if you were floating).  Conversely if interest rates fall 3% in one year, you would only get 0.5% saving, than if all your interest rates were floating.  This IRAS also makes choosing your next interest rate period quite easy!

Now of course life isn’t that simple and you can’t expect to be able to do this exactly – I don’t.  In fact like my mentoring students who I professional advise I am overweight to loans expiring around March 2014.  I broke this IRAS when the 5 year interest rates were so fundamentally cheap in March last year – I just couldn’t help myself!  The result of this is the saving of hundreds of thousands of dollars in client wealth from the number of people I was able to convince 6.5% for 5 years was a great deal.  It wasn’t a hard sell either – the catch is you have to follow financial cycles and interest rate movements.

Issues

There is a risk of a double dip recession.  Lets face it, whilst we are out of a recession the market is hardly booming.  I see Mortgagee Sales slightly rising, the number of days to sell a house rising, more fear in the market as to house price drops owing to fears investors will sell up with reduced returns thanks to the ETS, GST rises they cannot pass on (residential rental income is excluded from GST, as are interest costs, but rates, repairs & maintenance, property management fees etc are all subject to the GST increase).

With floating rates rising and scheduled to rise over the next 18 months, their may be some benefit fixing your rates.  The 4 and 5 year rates at around 7.5% – 7.85% now are looking more attractive (they simply weren’t at 8.5% or so).

The 2 and 3 year rates at 6.74% – 7.3% are other good possible options.  No-one has a crystal ball.  I think house prices will continue their slight decline to be down around 5% for the calendar year 2010.  This is on thin volumes too.  There is no doubt that we are in a property market downturn stage of the property cycle.

Talks of a recovery are too swift.  You only need to drive around Albany, down Wairau Road, around the back of Lynnmall in New Lynn, along Marua Road and to talk to commercial property investors and agents, look at the share price and annual financial reports of the listed property trusts to see that the commercial property market is struggling.  Taking depreciation off commercial property owners (including many owner occupiers) as well as residential property investors hasn’t helped things either.

Without trying to sound too special, I did say fix your borrowings last March in my blog titled Why are you floating – FIX LONG NOW!  If you didn’t consider my opinion and thought that you could outsmart the financial markets, and were proved wrong, you may have cost yourself and your families many thousands of dollars in extra interest paid to your bank.  That is ok, everyone makes mistakes including me.  However there is little point trying to fix it by floating everything now.  Spread your risk and spread your borrowing across a variety of interest rates, floating and various fixed terms.

Disclaimer:

The information contained on this website and from any communication related to this website is for information purposes only.  David Whitburn, Iodide Limited or entities owned, controlled or associated with David Whitburn (“David Whitburn entities”) do not hold themselves out to be providing any legal, financial or other advice.  David Whitburn entities do not make any recommendation or endorsement as to any product, investment, advisor or other service or product or to any material submitted by third parties or linked to this website.  Furthermore, David Whitburn entities do not offer any advice regarding the nature, potential value, viability or suitability of any particular investment, security or investment strategy for you or your needs.

The material on this website does not constitute advice and you should not rely on any material in this website to make or omit to make any decision or take or omit to take any action.

Saturday 29 May 2010

8:30am start to 6pm finish (registrations from 8am)

Parnell Jubilee Hall, 545 Parnell Road, Parnell, Auckland

The 2010 Annual Budget has just been presented and it implements the largest tax reforms New Zealand has seen in 25 years.  To arm you with the knowledge and tools to succeed in light of the Budget and in today’s market, the not-for-profit Auckland Property Investors’ Association (APIA) have a 1 day seminar BUDGET BUSTER 2010 – Strategies for Today’s Market with tickets at just $49.

The speakers include multiple best-selling Author and NZ Property Investors’ Federation Vice President Andrew King, who provides a State of the Property Investment Nation address, then sets the theme for both newer investors and more experienced investors with substantial portfolios.  APIA’s Treasurer & Chartered Accountant Ann Loudon has the all important topic of tax changes to go through, particularly in light of the depreciation changes and the taxation treatment of LAQCs to have to become aligned to Limited Liability Partnerships.  APIA’s Honorary Solicitor & Property Lawyer Tony Steindle then talks about structures, including the legal aspects of the Limited Liability Partnership, and APIA Vice President, Property Mentor & Trust Lawyer David Whitburn talks about what to buy in today’s market, how to buy it and how to analyse just what is a good deal or not.  APIA President & former NZ Mortgage Broker of the Year Sue Tierney then talks about finance in light of the turbulent global financial crisis we are in, particularly with the highly indebted European Union countries and the relevance of this to New Zealand.  ANZ Mobile Mortgage Manager Vanessa Murch then covers off financing in New Zealand, including why fixed interest rates are so high in comparison to floating loan rates and just how we get our loans approved.  In case this wasn’t enough content, we provide further value to you in relation to tenancy management with APIA Board Manager and Principal of leading boutique Property Management Firm Corinthian Limited Jan Galloway, presenting on how you should manage your property to get the best tenants and lowest vacancy rates.  This is combined with a presentation by Tenancy Practice Lawyer Scotney Williams, giving his expert advice on the Residential Tenancies Act including recent times and also proposals to reform parts of it.

So don’t delay, BOOK YOUR TICKET for Saturday 29th May at the Parnell Jubilee Hall by emailing admin@apia.org.nz now.


As a property investor, it is very important that you select the right strategy or strategies for your needs.  Most commonly the long-term buy and hold strategy creates the most wealth.  I acknowledge that often property investors diverge into property trading (buying with the intent to resell at a profit – eg. renovations and on-selling straight away), and some succeed at this when they time the market correctly and remember to pay GST and income tax on the properties that they trade.  However the vast majority I have mentored have truly excelled at the long-term buy and hold investment strategy.

With internet and social marketing coming to the fore, all too often we see property promoters drafting a large menu with so many choices, and telling us about how great our lives will be with another strategy.   Many property investors using the success from their long-term buy and hold strategy let their own greed kick in and they feed the greed of the property promoter of the day, and spend a small fortune on education on a different strategy to the one that has served them so well.  This is a distraction, and distractions cost you money.

My own mistakes and resolving them

Firstly I must admit that I’m not perfect here, having been distracted buying a Blue Peak property finding licence, but I soon realised the loss of focus in what I have truly excelled in, which is long-term residential property investment.  So I stopped and removed myself from the situation, settling out of court to allow me to focus on being a Dad for the first time and on my own business interests.

I would now note that the Blue Peak property finding system devised by Phil Jones, Sean Levy and Sean Wood has been proven not to work, and as is often the case with Phil Jones, he lost another good relationship he once had and litigation commenced amongst the other 2 promoters.

Phil then passed Blue Peak onto Steve Goodey’s Venture Property.  Some affected licence holders (including me) who felt that they had been ripped off, stood up to the promoters about the unethical and incompetently run Blue Peak scheme.  So I learned two things from this – (1) not to lose focus and go down distraction lane, and (2) not to conduct any business with Phil Jones.

Distraction Lane

On networking at the breaks during Dean Letfus & Shaun Stenning’s NZ Property Guru’s [sic] Auckland seminar earlier this month, and hearing from investors that have paid to go to courses with the next best thing to do in New Zealand, I have found that people over the past 2 years have been taught about:

  • Lease Options
  • Rent by the Room
  • NLP Training
  • Presidential Inner Circle
  • Tax Liens & Tax Deeds
  • then insert any other random sidetrack you had like internet marketing, sports betting software, FX trading, buying apartments in Australia, buying property in Guyana etc

These are all simply distractions and whilst some of them can make you good money (I have seen many people make good money from lease options and renting houses by the room), strategies like tax deeds and liens, US property and internet marketing seem to predominantly only make money for their unethical promoters like Shaun Stenning and Dean Letfus).  Think about the Hybrid Real Estate Board Game – there is a distraction lane that you go down, and as a seasoned player of the game since working with Kieran Trass in Hybrid in 2003, I knew going down it meant a significant retardation to the accumulation of my wealth in terms of both growing my equity, and my passive cashflow.

Seriously – what is wrong with sticking with one strategy, perhaps even making a few mistakes, then fine tuning it over time and mastering it.  This has worked well with property investment for at least 5 generations in my family, and I see little reason why it can’t for the next 5 (barring being on the losing side of a World War!).

 

Major Distraction – US Tax Liens/Deeds?

How it works is that some states of the USA are tax deed states, others are tax lien states.  States are divided up into counties for administrative reasons and each county levies property taxes for things like roads, streetlights, schools, internal governance and administration and community services.  If you don’t or can’t pay your property taxes a lien may by statute be put on your property in favour of the county which takes priority over a lender’s mortgage.  These liens get sold (usually by auction) from time to time by counties to investors to help with revenue collection.  Whether the state is a lien or deed state is irrelevant, as what was portrayed for sale was returns of 15% to 50% (in Texas).

Commercial Alert on Tax Liens and Tax Deeds for New Zealand Property Investors

From talking with dissatisfied purchasers in my network and reading PropertyTalk.com forum posts, and taking the time to understand the offering, I personally take issue with promoters who don’t tell the full story about significant aspects of their product.  During Steve Goodey’s presentation at NZ Property Gurus:

  1. There was no mention of US accountancy fees, nor state and federal tax compliance – which all will cost the Kiwi investor money;
  2. There was no mention of the NZ tax consequences (including the accrual regime) on the US tax liens;
  3. There was no mention of US initial structure (company/trust formation) costs – although this may have been in the US$5,995 pack and with a bit of ‘googling’ I could see LLC formation for as little as US$199;
  4. There was no mention of the minimum US$1,000 balance in the US bank account that apparently has to be opened by Kiwi Tax Lien/Deed investors;
  5. There was no mention of exchange rate risks (although I note that at $1NZD : US$0.69 this is less of a concern than it once was, however what is stopping the US Dollar devaluing to above $1NZD : US$0.80 or worse?);
  6. Legal costs to foreclose on a lien (a friend working as a lawyer in the US noted that it often costs over US$6,000 in legal fees to foreclose a lien owner, and it is not unheard of to be over US$20,000);
  7. Risks of buying a lemon property – you could purchase a piece of swampland, a landlocked property, a road, a tiny section with a tree on it, a footpath etc if you don’t do your due diligence properly;
  8. There is mention of being able to buy tax liens for as cheap as US$1 on a webinar, yet there is not a single deal done for remotely close to that price for a tax lien course subscriber of nearly 1 year;
  9. Risks of not buying anything at all and blowing US$5,995 – investors at Property Gurus that had purchased the Tax Liens course run by Steve Goodey in NZ, and by Phil Jones & Dan Ekelman (DANE Wealth Academy) in the USA have said that they have been trying to buy tax liens & deeds for months on eBay and following the techniques taught by the Millionaire Mastery/DANE training.  8 months later of genuine trying and they told me still no tax liens.  Other investors trying every couple of days for 3 months have not been able to secure any deals either;
  10. If it were so good why can’t more of the 305 million Americans purchase tax liens, rather than getting 4.3 million New Zealanders to purchase them;
  11. Why would an investor want to become a debt collector for US counties – many counties collect the easy debts themselves, and pass the hard ones onto investors;
  12. If you were a lender owed US$250,000, would you rather pay out a US$1,200 tax lien to protect your security in the event legal foreclosure notice is served by the lien holder?;
  13. Dean Letfus published on 9 March 2009, on the public PropertyTalk Forums that they are “they are snake oil, complete with white shoes and wagons” (source: published already on the internet at http://www.propertytalk.com/forum/showpost.php?p=168276&postcount=5).  Dean Letfus then expanded on this to say how dodgy they really are (source: Published on the internet already at http://www.propertytalk.com/forum/showpost.php?p=168389&postcount=8);
  14. There is a 100% satisfaction guarantee on www.cashflowliens.com that appears not be honoured – in fact I am informed that the promoters try to shirk it.
    12 We guarantee to teach exactly how to earn between 16% and 25% returns on your money and give you the exact step by step processes for buying real estate up to 90% BELOW MARKET Value in the USA AND we will show you precisely how you can do this from the comfort of your home where ever you live in the World without ever having to leave your own Country!

So for me, tax liens and tax deeds are a no go zone.  They may work if you are in the US and can commit time and knowledge to becoming a tax lien/deed expert.  It is my honest opinion that they will make the majority of NZ investors poorer than if they hadn’t invested in them at all.  So my advice is to read this great article by Rob Stock, who is one of New Zealand’s finest and most respected finance journalists, in the widely circulated Sunday Star Times on tax liens and tax deeds: http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/personal-finance/1762855/Beware-of-lien-returns.  Stop the promoters like Dean Letfus, Steve Goodey and Shaun Stenning from getting rich at your expense and don’t invest in them.

That’s all from me – stay focused and don’t go down distraction lane.  Stick to your knitting and enjoy the rest of your week.

Kind regards

David Whitburn


I have been asked a few times over the past week by property investors and home-owners alike why are the floating rate and 1 year or shorter fixed rates so much less than longer term fixed rates? Since interest is most investors and indeed home-owners biggest expense, as promised I wanted to provide a comprehensive answer to this.  Currently the floating rates being charged (by the major banks) are in a range of 5.25% – 6.40% (5.99% is the average) , 6 month fixed rates average 5.8%, and 1 year fixed rates average 6.25%.  Yet the longer term fixed rates are much higher with the average 3 year rate being 7.95%, the average 4 year rate is 8.50% and the average 5 year rate is 8.65%.  Source: www.mortgagerates.co.nz
Now I know most of my readers are probably like the majority of our population and are better at assimilating information shown graphically, rather than nestled in a paragraph of text, so lets take a look at this graphically:

So why are the long term fixed borrowing rates so much higher than shorter term rates at present?

Currently the Official Cash Rate (“OCR”) is at emergency levels in response to the Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”).  The OCR has a very strong correlation to floating rates, and also 6 month and even 1 year fixed term rates.  We have floating rates currently sitting at 40 year lows.  Banks aren’t going to lend you money at 5.75% for 5 years right now sorry, and nor are they likely to any time in the next 6 years in my opinion.  Some of you will hopefully have joined me and taken my blog on 16 March 2009 seriously, and fixed for 5 years at 6.50% or 7 years at 6.79% with BNZ.  I know many of my mentoring students are kicking themselves for not following my advice.  Don’t worry as I am regretting that I didn’t fix more a bit more debt for 5+ years.  Nowadays 5 years rate are coming down a tad, and the very cheapest 5 year rate is with HSBC Premier (the world’s largest bank) at just 7.95%.

5 reasons why there is such a difference now:

1. OCR doesn’t correlate well with long-term interest rates

The reason that the long term interest rates are so high is that the OCR has very little bearing on them.  The US 3, 4 and 5 year swap rates have far greater bearing on our 3, 4 and 5 year fixed rates, than the OCR does.  That said the OCR does have an impact.  And this is expected to rise from its 2.50% low level towards around 5.00% over the next couple of years.  Some economists are predicting the OCR to be risen to 2.75% on June 10th, however after the tax changes announced on May 20th this year in the Budget this year, I think that 6 weeks later in July is a more likely date for the OCR to have its first rise.  The rising unemployment and lack of inflationary pressures are what makes me think differently to the majority of economists.

2. Risk premium for OCR rises

In addition many think that the OCR will be 1% higher at 3.50% come Christmas 2010.  I don’t see this happening.  Therefore there is a lot of upside interest rate risk priced these longer fixed rates.
The next 3 reasons arise from the three major funding channels: deposit rates, short-term wholesale funding, long-term wholesale funding.

3. Deposit rates:

Banks are under intense competition in the term deposit market.  As a result the cost of deposits has greatly increased over the past year.  Banks are attempting to ensure they maintain and grow, this source of funding.  Banks also compete with a raft of recent corporate bond issues targeting retail investors.  Six-month deposit rates were generally priced at around 40 basis points below six-month bank bill rates prior to 2008, but have recently risen to more than 100 basis points over six-month bank bill rates.  Slightly ironically Kiwibank is again at the forefront of the battle for money invested in term deposits.

4. Short-term wholesale funding:

These costs have risen reflecting the increased spreads between offshore short-term funding rates and expected policy rates.  As shown by the chart below, these spreads have risen substantially during the crisis – peaking in late 2008 following the collapse of Lehman Brothers that triggered the greatest impact of the GFC.  These spreads have subsequently narrowed as central banks have provided increased liquidity and risk appetite has improved, but they remain above pre-crisis levels.  The new Reserve Bank liquidity rules mean that more funding must be sourced from offshore on longer-terms, which means that long-term fixed rates borrowed in NZ will more than likely be matched by long-term wholesale funding.  With most term deposit holders preferring shorter terms, there is increasingly less of a need for short-term wholesale funding.

5. Long-term wholesale funding:

These costs have eased from the highs seen in late 2008 – albeit to levels that are still significantly above those prevailing prior to the crisis.  Long-term wholesale funding costs are proxied (given the limited amount of recent bond issuance by New Zealand banks) by movements in Australian bank bond spreads, with a margin added to reflect the higher cost for NZ bank issuers.  Long-term wholesale funding has to increase under new Reserve Bank liquidity requirements – so longer-term fixed debt borrowed by a property investor in New Zealand, will more than likely need to be matched by borrowing this on the long-term wholesale funding market.  This market is more expensive, as the risks involved in fixing a rate for longer are (rightly in many people’s eyes) greater.  This new rule is a significant part of increasing the costs of long-term interest rates.
With acknowledgements to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand for answers 3-5.

Conclusion

So there you have my answers with some help from BNZ Chief Economist Tony Alexander in his latest weekly overview, ANZ National Bank Chief Economist Cameron Bagrie with his February Property Focus, and the good people of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.  As for what I am doing now on the debt I didn’t fix for 5+ years in March 2009, I am mixing it up a little bit between floating and taking 1 year rates.  In doing so I am paying from 5.25% to 6.15% (I like and have good success in negotiating discounts to interest rates with banks but that is another special topic that I prefer to reserve for my paid mentoring students).  With the ten year average interest rate across all categories (floating, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year fixed) averaging just under 8% now, I have big savings which I don’t blow on cars, lottery tickets or fancy holidays.  I use this money saved to repay debt, by paying down principal on loans.  Obviously if you have a mortgage on your own home, you should be paying down the principal on that firstly, as your own home’s debt is not tax deductible (I don’t want to know if you are one of the ‘special’ people renting their home from their own LAQC).  Once your own home is paid off, then you can tackle the debt on your investment properties later!

We have pretty good news fresh to hand with the keenly awaited comments from Prime Minister John Key in response to the Tax Working Group, in the opening of NZ Parliament this afternoon for 2010.  In Key’s opening address there is reason to celebrate for many commercial and residential property investors alike.

John Key stated:
we will not be developing any proposals for a land tax, a comprehensive capital gains tax, or a risk-free return method (RFRM) for taxing residential investment properties,”
Therefore our pockets aren’t going to be to heavily upset and the market will not be significantly impacted as there will be no Land Tax, no Capital Gains Tax, no Risk-free Return Method on equity or any new tax imposed on property investors.

However John Key raised concerns with the tax treatment on property investment as an asset class:

The government does believe there is a gap in the current tax system around property investments where income is being derived but, in aggregate, no tax is being paid – in fact the government is actually losing revenue in this sector,”

We will therefore be making changes to the way property is taxed, which will result in increased Government revenue and more fairness for the taxpayers. These changes will be announced in the budget.”

So it’s good news for now, with no Capital Gains Tax introduced, no re-introduction of a Land Tax and no tax on equity in property (the Risk-free Rate of Return Method).  Key and Minister of Finance Bill English had already ruled out imposing a Capital Gains Tax last year, and no-one in their right mind would impose the “risk-free rate of return method” on property investments as deductions would have been disallowed and equity would be taxed, not income/expenses.  The carnage in the market the risk-free rate of return method could only be caused by having economic pygmies in charge, and New Zealand is too smart to vote these socialist leaning parties into power.  Tenants can breathe easier too in that their rents will not be going up, to pay for our increased costs of a land tax.  Councils will be happy that their rates revenue will not be cut from land values reducing (a 0.5% land tax had been costed at around 17% reduction in land values by Westpac’s Chief Economist).

However there is the very real risk still open of depreciation changes and potentially more and different legislation put forward in the May budget with relevance to property investors.  It is likely that GST will be raised to 15% will compensation which will impact residential property investors a little bit, since residential rent is exempt from GST.

I personally predict in the May budget that there will be the following changes:
  1. trimming of depreciation to all buildings (residential and commercial) to 1%,
  2. lowering the chattels depreciation rate reductions,
  3. a line drawn in the sand to state that if you own an investment property for a period of time (eg. less than 10 years) and then resell it and make a profit, then that ‘capital’ gain is taxable.

We have to wait and see what happens in May next.  However now is clearly not the time for making rash decisions like selling your long term buy & hold properties.

I want to add a little bit more to my previous blog on whether to go for capital growth or equity as your property investment strategy?   Before I go on I will say that this is my opinion and the right strategy for you will depend on a number of things.  Particularly early in your wealthdevelopment you are going to need good cashflow - if you don’t have this from your job or Business then you will need this from your properties.

Timewarp to 2002 – triggers to me starting investing

I had read Andrew King and Lisa Didson’s best-selling book The Complete Guide to Residential property Investment in New Zealand, and Dolf de Roos and Jan Somers’ book Building Wealth Through Investment Property. I went as a guest of a friend’s parent to a couple of APIA, listened to property investment accounting guru Mark Withers talk on tax savings from property investment, and since I was a young corporate solicitor in what was then the top law firm in New Zealand I was on the top tax rate.  Some family and family friends were investing in property, I had helped my grandmother for years drive to collect rents from tenants and be her assistant property manager, so I knew it was time to invest myself.  Having been to fund manager, sharebroker and property investment seminars the presenters were saying that only between 1 and 8% of people retire rich, most are dead or dead broke (and obviously statistics get a little bit distorted or mis-interpreted a fair bit to sell a story sometimes).

So I had enough positive affirmation to make the decision to buy property.  I am delighted with all of the above that helped inspire to get me into property.

So I started looking in the property presses of Auckland, various papers, using websites and agents.

My $200,000 mistake (my case study)

Back in 2002 when I started my own direct property investing, I made a mistake.  At the time I didn’t think so, but hindsight is a wonderful thing.

I had narrowed my selection down to two properties - one in the lower decile suburb of Manurewa and one in the exclusive subrub of Remuera:

1) a 3 bedroom house on just over 800sqm in Manurewa, to be auctioned with agent’s estimated price and vendor’s RV of ~$152K, rental appraisal $260/wk, owner occupied, that would benefit from a minor cosmetic renovation; or

2) a 2 bedroom unit in Remuera with less than 300sqm land, list price $250K sale by negotiation, rental appraisal $275/wk; owner occupied by an elderly couple in need a cosmetic renovation.

Options:

Manurewa house: After talking with the respective agents and attending the Manurewa house auction where I was the only non agent there, I made a bid at the auciton at the nice low price of $125K.   This did not meet the vendor’s reserve so the auction was canned.  The vendor’s reserve and requirement was in fact $140K as he needed to clear his Mortgage of $133K and play to relocate to Australia $6K and of course $1K legal fees.  So $140K I was told would definately buy it.  The property would cost $7K to renovate with professional assistance or $2.5K if I did it myself and with friends.  The rental then would be $280/wk giving a 10% yield.

Remuera unit: I was told the vendor wasn’t very negotiable at all, the agent not revealing the vendors reasons to sell, apart from time to move on to a new place.  They said $250K would buy it.  The property would take $10K to renovate professionally or taking out the bits I could do $6K.  The rental then would be $300 per week giving a 6% yield.

Which property would you choose?

Well I choose property 1 the Manurewa property - being very attracted to the yield.  Cashflow is King right!   I got myself a pre-tax positive property and thought I was very clever.

After my renovation the property was valued at a Massive $160K up from the $150K if I hadn’t touched it.  In mid 2005 I still owned it and it was valued at just $175K.

Guess what the Remuera property was worth…

It sold two months after that registered date at $470,000.  All it needed was paint, carpets and a new benchtop, so even if the asking (list) price was paid, $10K for renovating this small-medium sized unit, it still went up over $200,000.  Allowing for the tax rebate this property was after-tax Cashflow positive.

Tired of my assigned property managers sadly hating their job managing South Auckland properties I had 7 property managers in this time, and rent arrears so I terminated their contract.  I managed the property myself for a while and got bored of turning up to collect rent arrears and finding their 5 children aged from 2-9 years of age unattended.  I asked the 9 year old where’s Mum, where’s Dad – I got told at the pub!  Sadly after won of these big day’s out Jake the Muss put his fist through the mother face fracturing her skull.  This didn’t help my rent arrears and I saw blood on the walls of my rapidly deteriorating home.

I rang Tenancy Services wanting to get an immediate eviction – but to no avail.  They were not 3 weeks behind in rent!  I had had enough and was pretty disappointed with project and managing it myself was rather stressful – so I changed my mind as I wanted to keep this property forever, and I sold it.

Look at my foregone equity – taking into account the nearly $150/wk after tax positive cashflow I made (interest rates were sub 7%), reno costs, but subtracting the lost rent and damage to the property that they couldn’t pay (they split up) I made less than $20K on this property.  The Remuera property would have made more than $200K after allowing for the costs of reno and cashflow

So I cost myself $200,000 by going for the positive cashflow property.

Equity is King once cashflow is sorted

I now know what my Granny and parents know – that cashflow is nice, and is needed when you are starting out building a portfolio.  But whenever you get a choice – choose equity.

Remember that when you have an equity portfolio you can choose to change to a cashflow portfolio (or even putting the money in the bank!), but try changing from a cashflow to equity portfolio straght away.  You will not be able to do it as you will not have much equity and hit debt sevice walls with the bank straight away.

Conclusion

I conclude that not everything you are taught is right.  Just because other investors do it does not make it right.  Cashflow is very important and you must always be able to meet your debt obligations, so you must focus on cashflow first and foremost as a small investor.  However once you have your cashflow in order then Equity is King.

Some readers may not like my message as I am directly seeking that they question their own cashflow strategy – however I want to say there are other strategies out there and I guess if I can help a couple of people reading this blog not blow many hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost equity as I did with sound cashflow, my job is done.