Archive for March, 2010

Once upon a time Japan was a truly amazing economy.  With a skilled and highly disciplined workforce, combined with a real passion to come back from the adversity and huge economic depression it suffered after losing World War II.  It really was an economic behemoth.  Japan was a technology pioneer with some of the world’s leading companies like Sony, Fuji, Toshiba, NEC, Nintendo, Fujitsu (and many more) and it wasn’t half bad at manufacturing vehicles either with global giants like Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Mazda, Honda etc.

Japan’s Problems

The problem for Japan is that its nominal GDP now is less than it was in 1992.  It appears that Japan has been in a long deep slumber for nearly two decades.  Last year was particularly savage for Japan, with the global financial crisis smashing this export dependent economy.  Japan’s economy contracted a large 8.6% from its peak in 2008 to the end of 2009, giving Japan its deepest recession since the nuclear annihilation of Hiroshima & Nagasaki brought a rapid end to World War II.  Japan’s nominal GDP fell 6 percent to 475 trillion yen last year, while its real GDP declined 5 percent. Meanwhile, nominal GDP in the United States decreased 1.3 percent to US$ 14.2 trillion and real GDP fell 2.4 percent.

In the 1980s Japan experienced a Super Bubble, where the total value of housing stock in Japan amounted to 40% of the global total of housing stock, and 7 of the 10 most wealthy billionaires in the 1980s were Japanese Property Developers.  Now Japan’s property prices have been declining at nearly 7% per annum for the past 18 or so years.

The Bank of Japan has forecast continued deflation throughout 2010 and into 2011.  The real issues for Japan are a shrinking labour force and ageing population, combined with a very high amount of debt.

Ageing Population Effects

It costs money to have an ‘older’ population.  In civilised countries we reward those who don’t save for themselves by providing housing, heavy medical & pharmaceutical subsidies, and an aged pension (eg. in New Zealand everybody 65 years or over gets the National Superannuation pension from Work & Income).  There is a lot more pressure on the health system as a result of ageing, as our bodies and minds start to wear out, but the huge knowledge and technological advances in healthcare, better diet, safer employment options as well as lower smoking rates have all contributed to developed countries around the world having their citizens live longer.  Japan has the very highest life expectancy rates at birth, of all countries in the world, at 82.6 years of age (world average 67.2 years).
The problem is that Japan’s population is stagnating with fertility and migration.  Japan has already over 21% of its population 65 years of age or older.  It’s workforce is shrinking.  Japan’s national debts in developed economies are driven by aging, and Government’s have to keep borrowing to keep election promises and maintain the Japanese people’s extremely high living standards.  Alarmingly Japan has a national debt at around 200 percent of its GDP, which is amongst the very highest in the world .

Rising national debts in developed economies are driven by aging. The benefits theypromised during the high growth period cannot be supported by governmentrevenues anymore. They resort to borrowing to keep promises. Japan’s national debt at ~192% percent of GDP is the second highest in the world.

What can Japan do?

Lately exports have picked up a bit in the global recovery.  The Democratic Party of Japan led by Yukio Hatoyama, now controls the Government, and have tried to stop deflation by putting huge pressure on the Bank of Japan to be more active in its governance of monetary policy.  The Government announced their own 7.2 trillion yen (~US$80 billion) fiscal stimulus package.  This package includes financial incentives to purchase energy-efficient cars & products, loan guarantees and employment subsidies.  The Bank of Japan then announced their own 10 trillion yen lending programme.

Immigration is the solution many developed countries around the world see to the problem, but this will be highly competitive as the years roll on.  Raising the retirement age to expand the workforce is another solution.  However I don’t think that this will significantly assist Japan.  I foresee big inflationary pressures to Japan as the debt they have is already very high as a percentage of national GDP.  If Japan gets its money printer out (quantitative easing) in the future to repay debts and provide for continued stimulus, it runs the risk of massive inflation.  No-one wants to see an economy as large as Japan’s become like Zimbabwe (screenshot of my 50 trillion Zimbabwean Dollar note – signed by Gideon Gono the Reserve Bank Governor of Zimbabwe):

A tough decade is in store for Japan who need to address their very real challenges of too high debt levels, shrinking labour force and ageing population.

Sources and Acknowledgments: Bloomberg, Daily Mail, Saturn Portfolio Private Client Seminar (Craig Stobo) March 2010, The Guardian, Wikipedia, CIA World Factbook.

As a property investor, it is very important that you select the right strategy or strategies for your needs.  Most commonly the long-term buy and hold strategy creates the most wealth.  I acknowledge that often property investors diverge into property trading (buying with the intent to resell at a profit – eg. renovations and on-selling straight away), and some succeed at this when they time the market correctly and remember to pay GST and income tax on the properties that they trade.  However the vast majority I have mentored have truly excelled at the long-term buy and hold investment strategy.

With internet and social marketing coming to the fore, all too often we see property promoters drafting a large menu with so many choices, and telling us about how great our lives will be with another strategy.   Many property investors using the success from their long-term buy and hold strategy let their own greed kick in and they feed the greed of the property promoter of the day, and spend a small fortune on education on a different strategy to the one that has served them so well.  This is a distraction, and distractions cost you money.

My own mistakes and resolving them

Firstly I must admit that I’m not perfect here, having been distracted buying a Blue Peak property finding licence, but I soon realised the loss of focus in what I have truly excelled in, which is long-term residential property investment.  So I stopped and removed myself from the situation, settling out of court to allow me to focus on being a Dad for the first time and on my own business interests.

I would now note that the Blue Peak property finding system devised by Phil Jones, Sean Levy and Sean Wood has been proven not to work, and as is often the case with Phil Jones, he lost another good relationship he once had and litigation commenced amongst the other 2 promoters.

Phil then passed Blue Peak onto Steve Goodey’s Venture Property.  Some affected licence holders (including me) who felt that they had been ripped off, stood up to the promoters about the unethical and incompetently run Blue Peak scheme.  So I learned two things from this – (1) not to lose focus and go down distraction lane, and (2) not to conduct any business with Phil Jones.

Distraction Lane

On networking at the breaks during Dean Letfus & Shaun Stenning’s NZ Property Guru’s [sic] Auckland seminar earlier this month, and hearing from investors that have paid to go to courses with the next best thing to do in New Zealand, I have found that people over the past 2 years have been taught about:

  • Lease Options
  • Rent by the Room
  • NLP Training
  • Presidential Inner Circle
  • Tax Liens & Tax Deeds
  • then insert any other random sidetrack you had like internet marketing, sports betting software, FX trading, buying apartments in Australia, buying property in Guyana etc

These are all simply distractions and whilst some of them can make you good money (I have seen many people make good money from lease options and renting houses by the room), strategies like tax deeds and liens, US property and internet marketing seem to predominantly only make money for their unethical promoters like Shaun Stenning and Dean Letfus).  Think about the Hybrid Real Estate Board Game – there is a distraction lane that you go down, and as a seasoned player of the game since working with Kieran Trass in Hybrid in 2003, I knew going down it meant a significant retardation to the accumulation of my wealth in terms of both growing my equity, and my passive cashflow.

Seriously – what is wrong with sticking with one strategy, perhaps even making a few mistakes, then fine tuning it over time and mastering it.  This has worked well with property investment for at least 5 generations in my family, and I see little reason why it can’t for the next 5 (barring being on the losing side of a World War!).

 

Major Distraction – US Tax Liens/Deeds?

How it works is that some states of the USA are tax deed states, others are tax lien states.  States are divided up into counties for administrative reasons and each county levies property taxes for things like roads, streetlights, schools, internal governance and administration and community services.  If you don’t or can’t pay your property taxes a lien may by statute be put on your property in favour of the county which takes priority over a lender’s mortgage.  These liens get sold (usually by auction) from time to time by counties to investors to help with revenue collection.  Whether the state is a lien or deed state is irrelevant, as what was portrayed for sale was returns of 15% to 50% (in Texas).

Commercial Alert on Tax Liens and Tax Deeds for New Zealand Property Investors

From talking with dissatisfied purchasers in my network and reading PropertyTalk.com forum posts, and taking the time to understand the offering, I personally take issue with promoters who don’t tell the full story about significant aspects of their product.  During Steve Goodey’s presentation at NZ Property Gurus:

  1. There was no mention of US accountancy fees, nor state and federal tax compliance – which all will cost the Kiwi investor money;
  2. There was no mention of the NZ tax consequences (including the accrual regime) on the US tax liens;
  3. There was no mention of US initial structure (company/trust formation) costs – although this may have been in the US$5,995 pack and with a bit of ‘googling’ I could see LLC formation for as little as US$199;
  4. There was no mention of the minimum US$1,000 balance in the US bank account that apparently has to be opened by Kiwi Tax Lien/Deed investors;
  5. There was no mention of exchange rate risks (although I note that at $1NZD : US$0.69 this is less of a concern than it once was, however what is stopping the US Dollar devaluing to above $1NZD : US$0.80 or worse?);
  6. Legal costs to foreclose on a lien (a friend working as a lawyer in the US noted that it often costs over US$6,000 in legal fees to foreclose a lien owner, and it is not unheard of to be over US$20,000);
  7. Risks of buying a lemon property – you could purchase a piece of swampland, a landlocked property, a road, a tiny section with a tree on it, a footpath etc if you don’t do your due diligence properly;
  8. There is mention of being able to buy tax liens for as cheap as US$1 on a webinar, yet there is not a single deal done for remotely close to that price for a tax lien course subscriber of nearly 1 year;
  9. Risks of not buying anything at all and blowing US$5,995 – investors at Property Gurus that had purchased the Tax Liens course run by Steve Goodey in NZ, and by Phil Jones & Dan Ekelman (DANE Wealth Academy) in the USA have said that they have been trying to buy tax liens & deeds for months on eBay and following the techniques taught by the Millionaire Mastery/DANE training.  8 months later of genuine trying and they told me still no tax liens.  Other investors trying every couple of days for 3 months have not been able to secure any deals either;
  10. If it were so good why can’t more of the 305 million Americans purchase tax liens, rather than getting 4.3 million New Zealanders to purchase them;
  11. Why would an investor want to become a debt collector for US counties – many counties collect the easy debts themselves, and pass the hard ones onto investors;
  12. If you were a lender owed US$250,000, would you rather pay out a US$1,200 tax lien to protect your security in the event legal foreclosure notice is served by the lien holder?;
  13. Dean Letfus published on 9 March 2009, on the public PropertyTalk Forums that they are “they are snake oil, complete with white shoes and wagons” (source: published already on the internet at http://www.propertytalk.com/forum/showpost.php?p=168276&postcount=5).  Dean Letfus then expanded on this to say how dodgy they really are (source: Published on the internet already at http://www.propertytalk.com/forum/showpost.php?p=168389&postcount=8);
  14. There is a 100% satisfaction guarantee on www.cashflowliens.com that appears not be honoured – in fact I am informed that the promoters try to shirk it.
    12 We guarantee to teach exactly how to earn between 16% and 25% returns on your money and give you the exact step by step processes for buying real estate up to 90% BELOW MARKET Value in the USA AND we will show you precisely how you can do this from the comfort of your home where ever you live in the World without ever having to leave your own Country!

So for me, tax liens and tax deeds are a no go zone.  They may work if you are in the US and can commit time and knowledge to becoming a tax lien/deed expert.  It is my honest opinion that they will make the majority of NZ investors poorer than if they hadn’t invested in them at all.  So my advice is to read this great article by Rob Stock, who is one of New Zealand’s finest and most respected finance journalists, in the widely circulated Sunday Star Times on tax liens and tax deeds: http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/personal-finance/1762855/Beware-of-lien-returns.  Stop the promoters like Dean Letfus, Steve Goodey and Shaun Stenning from getting rich at your expense and don’t invest in them.

That’s all from me – stay focused and don’t go down distraction lane.  Stick to your knitting and enjoy the rest of your week.

Kind regards

David Whitburn


We are in a very interesting phase of the property cycle at present.  There is no mistaking the fact that we are still in the downturn phase of this current property cycle.  New Zealand business confidence has not returned, there is an international environment of some fear with Greece, Spain, Portugal, the State of California in the USA, all having serious credit default issues.  Employment figures and the amount of mortgagee and indeed fire sales are hardly rosy news for the property market right now.  What’s worse is that there is a lot of fear in the market particularly amongst property investors with interest rates forecast to rocket up and uncertainty over tax changes.

As a result there is little wonder that house prices are slightly reducing, and the number of days to sell a property has been increasing in many areas across the country.  Uncertainty creates fear, and the manifestation of this emotion is to make excuses to defer a property based decision (such as buying or developing an investment property).  I think that we are in a W shaped recovery, and we are heading down towards the second V (of the W).  Fortunately this V is less unpleasant than 2008′s deep V, that we recovered from in 2009.

Revenue Minister Peter Dunne’s Comments Today

There is currently a lot of conjecture about just what the Government will do on 20 May 2010 in the budget.  Peter Dunne has suggested to a meeting of the Internal Fiscal Association at Christchurch (as reported in the NZ Herald), that:

This is not an attack on landlords, as some have protested, but a rebalancing act designed to address the concerns highlighted by both the Tax Working Group and the Governor of the Reserve Bank over the years about distortions favouring property investment over other forms of investment

There are also likely to be lower personal taxes across the board – not just for the top end of the income scale as some allege – to encourage productivity, investment and saving.

The proposal that GST be lifted to 15 per cent, would only go ahead if appropriate compensation was provided for those who need it, while no exemptions for specific items would be introduced.”

Anti-property commentators like Bernard Hickey will be very happy to hear of these tax changes, but still will no doubt be disappointed that the changes didn’t go far enough!  That said we all need to wait and see what the budget holds for us.  I agree that there needs to be a balance, but the reason for the perception of property investment being the best asset class in New Zealand is only a comparative one.  There is significant under performance in our shares and managed funds.  Some of this is indeed not helped by Government policy.  If we had a company tax rate lower than that of Australia and other countries in the world would we have had so many of our companies delist from the NZX.  Being a smaller country means that we cannot really afford to lose Nufarm, Fletcher Forests, Fletcher Paper, Fletcher Energy, Lion Nathan, companies have reduced the available pool of investment.

The simple fact is that the Australian Share Market is a much better performer than the New Zealand Share Market with better opportunities in for diversification, and in general growth.  Additionally the Australian Property Markets have also risen faster than those in New Zealand – that is capital growth rates are slightly higher than in New Zealand.

So why are so many bashing property?

Sadly it is all too common in New Zealand that if someone or something does well we try to knock it down a peg or two, to become “normal”.  The most unfortunate thing is that we should all be trying to bolster the lame ducks that are the share and managed fund industries in NZ.  Lets encourage and foster growth in shares and managed funds, rather than trying to slam property investors.

An example of the misinformation is that property investors make a net tax loss.  This is total fallacy.  Information sourced by the New Zealand Property Investors Federation from NZ Inland Revenue proved that in only two of the past 28 years did property investment make a net tax loss.  Yet the Tax Working Group and NZ Government still think property investors cost the country money.

Opportunities available

Whenever there is fear, there are also opportunities.  There are an enormous number of investors hurting and some banks are stockpiling mortgagee sales, as if they released them all the market would come tumbling down, along with their security values!  With less investors looking to buy, rents are likely to go up.  With some pessimistic  investors thinking that losses will be ring fenced (disallowed), and some business owners and people in general really feeling the pinch, some amazing deals have happened.  I know of an investor in West Auckland getting a property with council valuation at $625,000 (the registered valuation would be around $600 – 620K), for just $440,000.  Vendor finance, and options to purchase property in the future are becoming more popular options.

As a result I would encourage you not to be scared of the May 20th budget.  If you have a safety buffer and can get a pre-approval, consider buying an investment property now.  Get the best cashflow you can get, but buy well below value (aim for at least 20% of the value) and that way you will be buying a safe investment.

I remember what happened after September 11, in 2001, where the market stopped for a fair few days.  Some homeowners freaked and firesold their properties.  Those buying the properties had snapped up absolute bargains and also benefitted from the biggest boom in NZ history from early 2003 to mid-late 2007.

So gather all the information that you can, make the smart decisions and carpe diem.

I have been asked a few times over the past week by property investors and home-owners alike why are the floating rate and 1 year or shorter fixed rates so much less than longer term fixed rates? Since interest is most investors and indeed home-owners biggest expense, as promised I wanted to provide a comprehensive answer to this.  Currently the floating rates being charged (by the major banks) are in a range of 5.25% – 6.40% (5.99% is the average) , 6 month fixed rates average 5.8%, and 1 year fixed rates average 6.25%.  Yet the longer term fixed rates are much higher with the average 3 year rate being 7.95%, the average 4 year rate is 8.50% and the average 5 year rate is 8.65%.  Source: www.mortgagerates.co.nz
Now I know most of my readers are probably like the majority of our population and are better at assimilating information shown graphically, rather than nestled in a paragraph of text, so lets take a look at this graphically:

So why are the long term fixed borrowing rates so much higher than shorter term rates at present?

Currently the Official Cash Rate (“OCR”) is at emergency levels in response to the Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”).  The OCR has a very strong correlation to floating rates, and also 6 month and even 1 year fixed term rates.  We have floating rates currently sitting at 40 year lows.  Banks aren’t going to lend you money at 5.75% for 5 years right now sorry, and nor are they likely to any time in the next 6 years in my opinion.  Some of you will hopefully have joined me and taken my blog on 16 March 2009 seriously, and fixed for 5 years at 6.50% or 7 years at 6.79% with BNZ.  I know many of my mentoring students are kicking themselves for not following my advice.  Don’t worry as I am regretting that I didn’t fix more a bit more debt for 5+ years.  Nowadays 5 years rate are coming down a tad, and the very cheapest 5 year rate is with HSBC Premier (the world’s largest bank) at just 7.95%.

5 reasons why there is such a difference now:

1. OCR doesn’t correlate well with long-term interest rates

The reason that the long term interest rates are so high is that the OCR has very little bearing on them.  The US 3, 4 and 5 year swap rates have far greater bearing on our 3, 4 and 5 year fixed rates, than the OCR does.  That said the OCR does have an impact.  And this is expected to rise from its 2.50% low level towards around 5.00% over the next couple of years.  Some economists are predicting the OCR to be risen to 2.75% on June 10th, however after the tax changes announced on May 20th this year in the Budget this year, I think that 6 weeks later in July is a more likely date for the OCR to have its first rise.  The rising unemployment and lack of inflationary pressures are what makes me think differently to the majority of economists.

2. Risk premium for OCR rises

In addition many think that the OCR will be 1% higher at 3.50% come Christmas 2010.  I don’t see this happening.  Therefore there is a lot of upside interest rate risk priced these longer fixed rates.
The next 3 reasons arise from the three major funding channels: deposit rates, short-term wholesale funding, long-term wholesale funding.

3. Deposit rates:

Banks are under intense competition in the term deposit market.  As a result the cost of deposits has greatly increased over the past year.  Banks are attempting to ensure they maintain and grow, this source of funding.  Banks also compete with a raft of recent corporate bond issues targeting retail investors.  Six-month deposit rates were generally priced at around 40 basis points below six-month bank bill rates prior to 2008, but have recently risen to more than 100 basis points over six-month bank bill rates.  Slightly ironically Kiwibank is again at the forefront of the battle for money invested in term deposits.

4. Short-term wholesale funding:

These costs have risen reflecting the increased spreads between offshore short-term funding rates and expected policy rates.  As shown by the chart below, these spreads have risen substantially during the crisis – peaking in late 2008 following the collapse of Lehman Brothers that triggered the greatest impact of the GFC.  These spreads have subsequently narrowed as central banks have provided increased liquidity and risk appetite has improved, but they remain above pre-crisis levels.  The new Reserve Bank liquidity rules mean that more funding must be sourced from offshore on longer-terms, which means that long-term fixed rates borrowed in NZ will more than likely be matched by long-term wholesale funding.  With most term deposit holders preferring shorter terms, there is increasingly less of a need for short-term wholesale funding.

5. Long-term wholesale funding:

These costs have eased from the highs seen in late 2008 – albeit to levels that are still significantly above those prevailing prior to the crisis.  Long-term wholesale funding costs are proxied (given the limited amount of recent bond issuance by New Zealand banks) by movements in Australian bank bond spreads, with a margin added to reflect the higher cost for NZ bank issuers.  Long-term wholesale funding has to increase under new Reserve Bank liquidity requirements – so longer-term fixed debt borrowed by a property investor in New Zealand, will more than likely need to be matched by borrowing this on the long-term wholesale funding market.  This market is more expensive, as the risks involved in fixing a rate for longer are (rightly in many people’s eyes) greater.  This new rule is a significant part of increasing the costs of long-term interest rates.
With acknowledgements to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand for answers 3-5.

Conclusion

So there you have my answers with some help from BNZ Chief Economist Tony Alexander in his latest weekly overview, ANZ National Bank Chief Economist Cameron Bagrie with his February Property Focus, and the good people of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.  As for what I am doing now on the debt I didn’t fix for 5+ years in March 2009, I am mixing it up a little bit between floating and taking 1 year rates.  In doing so I am paying from 5.25% to 6.15% (I like and have good success in negotiating discounts to interest rates with banks but that is another special topic that I prefer to reserve for my paid mentoring students).  With the ten year average interest rate across all categories (floating, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year fixed) averaging just under 8% now, I have big savings which I don’t blow on cars, lottery tickets or fancy holidays.  I use this money saved to repay debt, by paying down principal on loans.  Obviously if you have a mortgage on your own home, you should be paying down the principal on that firstly, as your own home’s debt is not tax deductible (I don’t want to know if you are one of the ‘special’ people renting their home from their own LAQC).  Once your own home is paid off, then you can tackle the debt on your investment properties later!